Ad

Triumph Speed 400 Vs Kawasaki Kx65

Triumph Speed 400 Vs Kawasaki Kx65 Planning on buying a bike? Confused about bikes that are the best in the industry? Use the carbike360 comparison tool to examine the similarities and differences between different bikes in terms of pricing, features, performance, and more. You can select up to four automobiles at a time. So lock-in and start comparing your shortlisted cars right here at carbike360.
Read More...

Ex-Showroom Price2.40 Lakh3.12 Lakh
EMI
₹4,432 /month
8.5% for 5 years
Calculate EMI
₹5,761 /month
8.5% for 5 years
Calculate EMI
BrochureDownload BrochureDownload Brochure
User Rating
0

0

0

0

Ex-Showroom Price
2.40 Lakh
3.12 Lakh
EMI
₹4,432 /month
8.5% for 5 years
Calculate EMI
₹5,761 /month
8.5% for 5 years
Calculate EMI
Brochure
User Rating
0

0

0

0

Engine TypeLiquid-cooled, 4 valve, DOHC, single-cylinder-
Displacement398.15 cc-
Max Torque37.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm-
Cooling SystemLiquid Cooled-
Fuel SupplyFuel Injection-
ClutchWet, multi-plate, slip & assist-
Gear Box6 Speed-
Bore89.0 mm-
Stroke64.0 mm-
Compression Ratio12:1-
Emission Typebs6-2.0-
Engine Type
Liquid-cooled, 4 valve, DOHC, single-cylinder
Displacement
398.15 cc
Max Torque
37.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Fuel Supply
Fuel Injection
Clutch
Wet, multi-plate, slip & assist
Gear Box
6 Speed
Bore
89.0 mm
Stroke
64.0 mm
Compression Ratio
12:1
Emission Type
bs6-2.0

Instrument ConsoleAnalogue-
SpeedometerAnalogue-
Instrument Console
Analogue
Speedometer
Analogue

SpeedometerAnalogue-
DisplayLED-
Speedometer
Analogue
Display
LED

Body TypeCruiser Bikes-
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes

Width814 mm760 mm
Height1084 mm955 mm
Fuel Capacity13 l3.8 Litres
Wheelbase1377 mm1120 mm
Kerb Weight170 kg60 kg
Seat height790 mm760 mm
Width
814 mm
760 mm
Height
1084 mm
955 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 l
3.8 Litres
Wheelbase
1377 mm
1120 mm
Kerb Weight
170 kg
60 kg
Seat height
790 mm
760 mm

HeadlightLED-
Tail LightLED-
Turn Signal LampLED-
Headlight
LED
Tail Light
LED
Turn Signal Lamp
LED

Front Brake Diameter300 mm210 mm
Rear Brake Diameter230 mm240 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
210 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
240 mm

Peak Power40 PS @ 8000 rpm-
Drive TypeX-ring chain-
TransmissionManualManual
Peak Power
40 PS @ 8000 rpm
Drive Type
X-ring chain
Transmission
Manual
Manual

Suspension Front43 mm upside down Big Piston forks. 140mm wheel travelelescopic fork
Suspension RearGas monoshock RSU with external reservoir and pre-load adjustment. 130 mm wheel travelUni Trak Swingarm
Brakes FrontDiscDisc
Brakes RearDiscDisc
ABSDual Channel-
Tyre SizeFront :-110/70 R17, Rear :-150/60 R17Front :-60/100-14, Rear :- 80/100-12
Wheel SizeFront :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mmFront :-355.6 mm, Rear :-304.8 mm
Wheels TypeAlloy-
FrameHybrid spine/perimeter, tubular steel, bolt-on rear subframeTubular, semi-double cradle
Tubeless TyreTubeless-
Suspension Front
43 mm upside down Big Piston forks. 140mm wheel travel
elescopic fork
Suspension Rear
Gas monoshock RSU with external reservoir and pre-load adjustment. 130 mm wheel travel
Uni Trak Swingarm
Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc
ABS
Dual Channel
Tyre Size
Front :-110/70 R17, Rear :-150/60 R17
Front :-60/100-14, Rear :- 80/100-12
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-355.6 mm, Rear :-304.8 mm
Wheels Type
Alloy
Frame
Hybrid spine/perimeter, tubular steel, bolt-on rear subframe
Tubular, semi-double cradle
Tubeless Tyre
Tubeless

Triumph speed 400 Comparison with similar bikes

Speed 400

vs

Apache RTR 160

Triumph

TVS

Speed 400

Apache RTR 160

2.40 Lakh Onwards

1.20 Lakh Onwards

Compare Speed 400 vs Apache RTR 160
Speed 400

vs

Classic 350

Triumph

Royal Enfield

Speed 400

Classic 350

2.40 Lakh Onwards

1.93 Lakh Onwards

Compare Speed 400 vs Classic 350
Speed 400

vs

Pulsar NS200

Triumph

Bajaj

Speed 400

Pulsar NS200

2.40 Lakh Onwards

1.49 Lakh Onwards

Compare Speed 400 vs Pulsar NS200
Speed 400

vs

Pulsar N160

Triumph

Bajaj

Speed 400

Pulsar N160

2.40 Lakh Onwards

1.22 Lakh Onwards

Compare Speed 400 vs Pulsar N160
Speed 400

vs

Hunter 350

Triumph

Royal Enfield

Speed 400

Hunter 350

2.40 Lakh Onwards

1.50 Lakh Onwards

Compare Speed 400 vs Hunter 350
Speed 400

vs

MT 15 V2

Triumph

Yamaha

Speed 400

MT 15 V2

2.40 Lakh Onwards

1.68 Lakh Onwards

Compare Speed 400 vs MT 15 V2

Kawasaki kx65 Comparison with similar bikes

Kx65

vs

Classic 350

kawasaki

Royal Enfield

Kx65

Classic 350

3.12 Lakh Onwards

1.93 Lakh Onwards

Compare Kx65 vs Classic 350
Kx65

vs

MT 15 V2

kawasaki

Yamaha

Kx65

MT 15 V2

3.12 Lakh Onwards

1.68 Lakh Onwards

Compare Kx65 vs MT 15 V2
Kx65

vs

Bullet 350

kawasaki

Royal Enfield

Kx65

Bullet 350

3.12 Lakh Onwards

1.74 Lakh Onwards

Compare Kx65 vs Bullet 350
Kx65

vs

R15 V4

kawasaki

Yamaha

Kx65

R15 V4

3.12 Lakh Onwards

1.82 Lakh Onwards

Compare Kx65 vs R15 V4
Kx65

vs

Meteor 350

kawasaki

Royal Enfield

Kx65

Meteor 350

3.12 Lakh Onwards

2.05 Lakh Onwards

Compare Kx65 vs Meteor 350
Kx65

vs

Speed 400

kawasaki

Triumph

Kx65

Speed 400

3.12 Lakh Onwards

2.40 Lakh Onwards

Compare Kx65 vs Speed 400

Pros And Cons

Triumph Speed 400

  • Premium and well-built exterior design and build quality.
  • Smooth and tractable 398cc single-cylinder engine, offering accessible performance.
  • Impressive handling characteristics, providing predictability and neutrality.
  • Stellar ride quality, effectively absorbing bumps and maintaining composure.
  • A good set of features, including ride-by-wire, torque-assist clutch, and all-LED lighting.

Kawasaki KX65

  • For the segment, the 65cc engine offers satisfactory performance.
  • It makes off-road rides quite easy.
  • The suspension setup is fully adjustable.